Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-22739-apmail-forrest-dev-archive=forrest.apache.org@forrest.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 41914 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 02:53:51 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 02:53:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 46851 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 02:53:50 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org
Received: (qmail 46814 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 02:53:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@forrest.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@forrest.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@forrest.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.forrest.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org
Received: (qmail 46802 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2006 02:53:49 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:53:49 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of williamstw@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.201 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.184.201] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.201)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:53:49 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so22000wra
        for <dev@forrest.apache.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:53:28 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=EL3v0/WiSk8hAWVnog6oERQr7aeKnyN+SH4jwHrnBa8OtSVmQYJOAYAOxkNGlKe6pWA+mLhoJzBENlFGGuKpsOVEC5eQGpVahEWM6R3mMkFRPwqrMHeH4hzqKWgi3hbLbebyd46lF5Vp8bdIORnGmJjOqbo7W8GsY/c+XznKY4Q=
Received: by 10.54.128.18 with SMTP id a18mr115011wrd;
        Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.118.8 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <499888440602141853g366e9a38y2f58035d7279bd15@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:53:28 -0500
From: Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
To: "dev@forrest" <dev@forrest.apache.org>
Subject: Re: more on locationmap caching
In-Reply-To: <499888440602101717r65d8b650ha6f35e05a4959cfc@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <499888440602101717r65d8b650ha6f35e05a4959cfc@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 2/10/06, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that implementing CacheableProcessingComponent with an
> input module like LM isn't feasible since there's only one instance of
> it and it won't help us cache at the more granular level.  I think I
> confirmed that by following it through it's lifecycle this evening.
>
> Anyway, Ross is on to correcting the validity issue so I thought I'd
> spend some time on figuring out how to get away from our
> homegrown-hashmap-cache.  I think instead of trying to use the cocoon
> cache, the answer is to manage validity ourselves and go directly to
> the store.    This gets our little lm cache "managed" with the real
> cocoon store as i think it should be.
>
> The only problem that I can foresee is our current transient store is set=
 with:
>
> <parameter name=3D"maxobjects" value=3D"100"/>
>
> 100 seems extremely small to me anyway but I think if we started to
> use it for the lm, we'd find that it's definitely too small and would
> spend as much resources cleaning itself as to make it not worth it.
> Anyone know why it shouldn't be larger?
>
> Does storing lm cached hints in the transient store seem reasonable?
>
> Thanks,
> --tim


FYI. I'm not very keen on implementing it yet, but we may be forced to
decide just how important this is to us.  We'll see if I get any other
responses, but I'm not holding my breath...

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=3D113995323300001&r=3D1&w=3D2

--tim