forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: more on locationmap caching
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:53:28 GMT
On 2/10/06, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that implementing CacheableProcessingComponent with an
> input module like LM isn't feasible since there's only one instance of
> it and it won't help us cache at the more granular level.  I think I
> confirmed that by following it through it's lifecycle this evening.
>
> Anyway, Ross is on to correcting the validity issue so I thought I'd
> spend some time on figuring out how to get away from our
> homegrown-hashmap-cache.  I think instead of trying to use the cocoon
> cache, the answer is to manage validity ourselves and go directly to
> the store.    This gets our little lm cache "managed" with the real
> cocoon store as i think it should be.
>
> The only problem that I can foresee is our current transient store is set with:
>
> <parameter name="maxobjects" value="100"/>
>
> 100 seems extremely small to me anyway but I think if we started to
> use it for the lm, we'd find that it's definitely too small and would
> spend as much resources cleaning itself as to make it not worth it.
> Anyone know why it shouldn't be larger?
>
> Does storing lm cached hints in the transient store seem reasonable?
>
> Thanks,
> --tim


FYI. I'm not very keen on implementing it yet, but we may be forced to
decide just how important this is to us.  We'll see if I get any other
responses, but I'm not holding my breath...

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113995323300001&r=1&w=2

--tim

Mime
View raw message