Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: svn commit: r367799 - /forrest/branches/dispatcher/
From: Thorsten Scherler <thorsten@apache.org>
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <43C4329A.5010102@apache.org>
References: <20060110213703.41767.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
	 <43C4329A.5010102@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:01:07 +0100
Message-Id: <1136934067.8266.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

El mar, 10-01-2006 a las 22:18 +0000, Ross Gardler escribi=C3=B3:
> thorsten@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: thorsten
> > Date: Tue Jan 10 13:36:57 2006
> > New Revision: 367799
> >=20
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=3D367799&view=3Drev
> > Log:
> > Creation of the dispatcher refactoring branch
> >=20
> > Added:
> >     forrest/branches/dispatcher/
>=20
> I'm a little confused here. This is not a branch, it is a new directory=20
> within the branches repository.
>=20
> What are you intending on doing in here and why is it not a true branch?
>=20
> Ross

It is not a true branch because I will change 5% of the trunk.=20

I have copied the related resources into the branch and renamed them.

Now I can
ln -s=20
them with the trunk again. It is like I am working with the trunk but
doing the editing in the dispatcher branch. This way we do not have to
merge the branch, because the resulting work will replace all
view/dispatcher related work of the trunk.

I thought I should use a branch for it. That is what you suggested the
other time (or better said I understood).=20

Is there a problem with the chosen method?

salu2
--=20
thorsten

"Together we stand, divided we fall!"=20
Hey you (Pink Floyd)