Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45418 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 16:07:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Dec 2005 16:07:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 73533 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2005 16:07:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 73506 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2005 16:07:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 73495 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2005 16:07:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:07:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.23.3.142] (HELO rutherford.zen.co.uk) (212.23.3.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:07:15 -0800 Received: from [82.69.78.226] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EsMmM-0001fh-Dd for dev@forrest.apache.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:06:54 +0000 Message-ID: <43B55B0A.6000509@apache.org> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:06:34 +0000 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Writing generated page to disk in "forrest run" References: <43B554D1.7050804@apache.org> <412468978.20051230170403@soethe.net> In-Reply-To: <412468978.20051230170403@soethe.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.78.226] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > Ross Gardler wrote: > > I really like that idea. > Perhaps instead of using an IFrame put those commands in the existing > Firefox-Extension? Yeah, I though of that, but it would only work with Firefox. However, since the functionality will only be a webapp (i.e. called by http requests) then it would be easy enough to provide toolbars for the various browsers instead of using the iframe. The iframe would eventually become a fallback mechanism for those not installing the toolbars. Ross