Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: xpath insertion point thought [was: cocoon: Fwd: Pull Parsing]
From: Thorsten Scherler <thorsten@apache.org>
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <439D7DC0.2010500@apache.org>
References: <499888440512080614ra2b6f0bw2ca2d90b9af8b63@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1134308672.10998.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1134394271.10498.42.camel@localhost>  <439D7DC0.2010500@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:03:07 +0100
Message-Id: <1134403387.10498.50.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

El lun, 12-12-2005 a las 13:40 +0000, Ross Gardler escribió:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I had a look on this but encountered some problems. 
> > All examples and the axis2 code assumes that you have jdk 5.0 installed,
> > because they are using the javax.xml.stream package which is part of 5.0
> > and the JAXP. 
> > 
> > We are using 1.4 for forrest and I have not tried with 5.0. Now I found
> > http://woodstox.codehaus.org/ which is an Open Source StAX-compliant
> > XML-processor written in Java.
> > 
> > I really would like to play around with the OM in axis2 but am a wee bit
> > lost what to do with the javax.xml.stream package.
> > 
> > some ideas?
> 
> If it makes your life easier how about we make Forrest + Dispatcher 
> dependant on 1.5?
> 

Hmm, that is ATM for myself sadly not possible since I am in to many
project where I cannot yet use 5.

> There are some good features in 1.5 that we will find useful and we are 
> increasing our use of Java quite a bt at present.
> 
> Java 1.5 has been out for a while and even if the dispatcher goes into 
> the 0.9 release it will be a further few months before we move to 
> requiring java 1.5. Furthermore, if anyone can't upate to 1.5 they would 
> still have the option of using skins until such a time as they can upgrade.
> 

Yeah, anyway I think we should take one step at a time and first finish
the dispatcher with a DOM implementation (like it is right now). I have
created an interface so it will be easy to later on switch to a StAX
implementation. 

wdyt?


> Ross
> 
> 
> 
-- 
thorsten

"Together we stand, divided we fall!" 
Hey you (Pink Floyd)