forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <cross...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Using the xhtml2 plugin as final dispatcher plugin
Date Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:42:14 GMT
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> >Tim Williams escribi??:
> >>Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> >>
> >>>how should we proceed for cleaning up v2?
> >>>
> >>>I will soon commit a first working version of the DispatcherTransformer.
> >>>That means that 75% of the pipelines in structurer/themer will be gone.
> >>>I would like to use this opportunity and create the final internal
> >>>plugin (dispatcher) which should replace skins and old views (incl. v2).
> >>>I want to write this plugin from scratch (meaning to add pipeline by
> >>>pipeline).
> >>>
> >>>This plugin should contain the structurer and themer as components but
> >>>not anymore as 2 separate plugins. Further since the markup of contracts
> >>>have changed I want to use the opportunity to base the dispatcher
> >>>internally completely on xhtml2. Meaning all contracts are expecting
> >>>xhtml2 and *not* xdocs as source format.
> >>
> >>So can we just clear out the xhtml2 plugin and use that?  That's
> >>really what it was intended for Views+XHTML2 IIRC.  I think it's safe
> >>to remove most everything in there except the xhtml2_subset.xml file. 
> >>Everything else in there is OBE.
> >>
> >>I'd personally rather see that, rather than YAVRP (yet another
> >>view-related plugin) ;)
> >
> >I agree with Tim and would start to 
> >a) clean the xhtml2 from v1
> >b) starting to add refactored structurer (*.fv) and contracts (*.ft) to
> >the xhtml2 plugin
> >c) removing v2 when finished the migration.
> >
> >wdyt?
> 
> Since you don't say it is lazy consensus...
> 
> +1

The default is lazy consensus. So just get on with the job
unless someone asks to stop, review, perhaps revert.

-David

Mime
View raw message