Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4386E96B.9010100@pcotech.fr>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:37:31 +0100
From: Cyriaque Dupoirieux <Cyriaque.Dupoirieux@pcotech.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: upgrade fop?
References: <200511232359.40041.diwaker@apache.org>
 <438587E5.9050106@pcotech.fr> <43858EC6.7060103@apache.org>
 <20051125035602.GA4231@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <4386E40B.5060804@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4386E40B.5060804@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Ross Gardler a �crit :

> David Crossley wrote:
>
>> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Diwaker Gupta a ?crit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=113270183731548&w=2
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we want to upgrade yet? 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They wrote in FOP site :
>>>>
>>>>  *     This release is a (unstable) preview release and not intended
>>>>    for use in a production environment. Use at your own risk!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we can wait until the FOP 0.90 ?
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 for waiting
>>
>>
>>
>> However we don't need to wait all the way until the
>> official final release. At Forrest we have a policy
>> that we can use pre-release versions.
>>
>> We need to make sure that it works in Cocoon 2.2 first
>> then try it here. The Cocoon FOP Block might need to be
>> upgraded (yes, just tried and it does). It would be good
>> to give the FOP people some feedback along the way.
>
>
> You make a good point, Ignore my preference for waiting.

Yes indeed, I also don't know what to think now.
I didn't wanted to add problems in order we focus on the existing ones, 
but in fact, maybe I was wrong...

Cyriaque,

>
> Ross
>
>