Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of williamstw@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.207 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=fuAmRvfS0bQUULUf1TJi44Y4scUatTKu0qf6w/EupgFqZLr3ZSt5K4h6wKXjUwPI20UxHC3QSAyDighOa3r1XpkPG9v8Yzx/hV1jW9tPVxsSqMvyiJJdT7y8594wFBh1KTy4yQj/W3+WOUSOChdZKvFg456kmSy8nfrP8Z37vd4=
Message-ID: <4998884405090906175ad54ee9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 09:17:48 -0400
From: Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
Reply-To: williamstw@gmail.com
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r279511 -
 /forrest/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2/resources/stylesheets/xhtml2_to_html.xsl
In-Reply-To: <43217C84.1060008@apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050908044053.4694.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
	 <43217C84.1060008@apache.org>

On 9/9/05, Ross Gardler <rgardler@apache.org> wrote:
> twilliams@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: twilliams
> > Date: Wed Sep  7 21:40:42 2005
> > New Revision: 279511
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=3D279511&view=3Drev
> > Log:
> > can't return all the html, head, stuff for insertion in the pipeline.  =
temporary solution to get on with pipeline testing
>=20
> Why do you want the output to look like document2html output and then be
> passed into the existing pipelines?

Because that's how views work right now.  I didn't have this grand
redesign scheme in my mind at the time.  I thought we were getting
XHTML2 to work with the current views and replacing the **body-*.html
aggregation "part" in the **page pipeline with an xthml2tohtml
equivalent was how I did it.
=20
> Don't we just want XHTML2 -> output plugin =3D desired output

That's what it is, but views operate on html structured like the
output of document2html.  I wasn't redesigning views, just getting
xhtml2 to work with them.
=20
> Meaning we only need an XHTML2_to_HTML stylesheet>
>
> (I recall a conversation Tim and I had on IRC in which he asked me why
> we need the XHTML2HTML stylesheet. I seem to remember the answer I gave
> was misleading to say the least. Hopefully recent discussions about the
> new pipeline will have clarified - if not I'll try agian when I
> understand the intent of this commit, I may be missing something)
>=20
> Ross

I could very well be missing something but like I tried to explain in
the other thread, to get xhtml2 to work with views (or the current
skins for that matter) we need two things:
1) a xslt that outputs html with the same structure of document2html
2) a change in the **page pipeline to call that instead of **body-*.html

Even when we do what you suggest and use contracts for everything
instead of aggregation, the implementation of that contract will still
need something similar to this.

--tim