Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4321AA2C.9020906@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:28:44 +0100
From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r279511 -
 /forrest/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2/resources/stylesheets/xhtml2_to_html.xsl
References: <20050908044053.4694.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
 <43217C84.1060008@apache.org> <4998884405090906175ad54ee9@mail.gmail.com>
 <20050909151751.GA25047@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20050909151751.GA25047@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

David Crossley wrote:
> Tim Williams wrote:
> 
>>Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>>Why do you want the output to look like document2html output and then be
>>>passed into the existing pipelines?
>>
>>Because that's how views work right now.  I didn't have this grand
>>redesign scheme in my mind at the time.  I thought we were getting
>>XHTML2 to work with the current views and replacing the **body-*.html
>>aggregation "part" in the **page pipeline with an xthml2tohtml
>>equivalent was how I did it.
>> 
>>
>>>Don't we just want XHTML2 -> output plugin = desired output
>>
>>That's what it is, but views operate on html structured like the
>>output of document2html.  I wasn't redesigning views, just getting
>>xhtml2 to work with them.
> 
> 
> Now i see. Tim is aiming to do the work in stages.
> Get part of the XHTML2 working with the existing views
> and skinning.
> 
> Others are leaving the existing skins and views systems
> in place to continue operating as they do, while building
> a parallel plugin (plugins) that do XHTML2 all the way
> through.
> 
> Is that where the mismatch is occuring?

Certainly, that is the case with this commit. I'm not sure if this is a 
good approach or not, only experimentation will show. So, please Tim, 
don't delete your local changes. We are still asking questions and 
learning from one anothers experiments.

Ross