Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:13:00 +1000
From: David Crossley <crossley@apache.org>
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] svn access to forrest for cocoon committers
Message-ID: <20050914071300.GA8646@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
References: <20050905042052.GB22728@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050905042052.GB22728@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

The vote is closed. So the summary ...                                                              
6 binding +1 and 1 non-binding +0                                                                   
1 binding -0                                                                                        
                                                                                                    
The consensus is positive.

-David

David Crossley wrote:
> See discussion in
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=112555686731268
> "
> Back in July 2003 before Forrest became a top-level
> project, we decided [1] to give Cocoon committers
> access to the Forrest CVS Repository. That is
> something that we need to re-decide, so now seems
> a good time. The reason that we need to revisit,
> is that the formality for creating Apache Forrest
> as a top-level project includes defining our
> project guidelines which includes deciding who
> gets commit access.
> "
> [1]
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105645457400003
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105738941000001
> 
> Should we give Cocoon committers access to the
> Forrest repository?
> 
> The vote finishes on 12 September and will be
> decided by consensus approval.
> 
> -David