Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40377 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2005 01:05:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2005 01:05:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 57665 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2005 01:05:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 57645 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2005 01:05:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 57632 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2005 01:05:55 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:05:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.247.155.33] (HELO swip.net) (212.247.155.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:06:08 -0700 X-T2-Posting-ID: 9CPt+7HJT1aqkdVB06Niaw== Received: from [83.180.134.162] (HELO 192.168.2.4) by mailfe10.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 243730705 for dev@forrest.apache.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 03:05:50 +0200 Subject: Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access From: Thorsten Scherler To: dev@forrest.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20050903001842.GB16339@igg.indexgeo.com.au> References: <20050901043850.GC7996@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <20050901074039.GA8774@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <20050902082737.GA12772@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <499888440509020944434b0e07@mail.gmail.com> <1125689179.5080.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49988844050902131347198b69@mail.gmail.com> <20050903001842.GB16339@igg.indexgeo.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 03:05:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1125709548.5097.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 10:18 +1000, David Crossley wrote: ... > As i said earlier in this thread, this is not the > normal practise. It is a new experiment between > the Cocoon-based projects. Not so new after all for lenya/cocoon. I (and all other initial lenya committer) got 2003 this rights. Every cocoon or lenya committer has write access to the other rep. Like I stated I as well had write access to forrest since then. The new thing is the formalization of it. Cocoon and lenya already did this. /infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization [/lenya] @lenya = rw @cocoon = rw @forrest = rw [/cocoon] @lenya = rw @cocoon = rw Only forrest is missing to as well give write access to their repository to cocoon/lenya committer. -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)