forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: [RT] Split cocoon from forrest
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:59:07 GMT
David Crossley wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>>the update try experience made me think why are we not splitting cocoon
>>apart from forrest. 
>>I mean you would need them both to make forrest running. That would
>>overcome the whole procedure. We can set certain revision numbers of
>>cocoon-2.2 till it is not released. Kind of we having in lenya.
>>Any thoughts?
> I don't like it.


> I can visualise us having to support a stack of Cocoon user
> questions and we don't have enough people here to help.
> Also we use cocoon trunk so that makes it even harder
> for our users.
> I would rather than we Forrest committers did a little bit
> of extra work, to make it easier for our developers/users.

Or simply rearrange and separate the Cocoon bits from the Forrest bits
to make update easier.

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

View raw message