Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65475 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2005 09:29:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2005 09:29:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 69711 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2005 09:29:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 69667 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2005 09:29:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 69651 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2005 09:29:50 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 02:29:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [217.199.181.91] (HELO ns3.wkwyw.net) (217.199.181.91) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 02:30:11 -0700 Received: (qmail 9678 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2005 09:29:50 -0000 Received: from 82-69-78-226.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (82.69.78.226) by ns3.wkwyw.net with SMTP; 10 Aug 2005 09:29:50 -0000 Message-ID: <42F9C909.7090009@apache.org> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:29:45 +0100 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: release date in release notes References: <200508092322.23858.diwaker@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <200508092322.23858.diwaker@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Diwaker Gupta wrote: > I was just reading the release notes for 0.7 when I realized that our release > notes don't contain the release date. I think its a good idea to include the > release date: I clearly overlooked this when creating the reslease notes XSL in the projectInfo plugin. The date is available in the status.xml (from which release notes are generated) so it's only a small patch to the XSL. Please make the patch or raise an issue so we don't forget for the next release. Ross