Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6523 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2005 22:00:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2005 22:00:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 5548 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2005 22:00:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 5507 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2005 22:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 5487 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2005 22:00:32 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:00:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [217.199.181.91] (HELO ns3.wkwyw.net) (217.199.181.91) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:00:21 -0700 Received: (qmail 12724 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2005 22:00:35 -0000 Received: from 82-69-78-226.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (82.69.78.226) by ns3.wkwyw.net with SMTP; 4 Aug 2005 22:00:35 -0000 Message-ID: <42F28FF5.6080609@apache.org> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 23:00:21 +0100 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: using additional *.xconf (Was: svn commit: r227190) References: <20050803100133.67925.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <20050804003548.GB27209@igpb.indexgeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050804003548.GB27209@igpb.indexgeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Crossley wrote: > Do we actually need to use XConfToolTask? > Cocoon recently [1] gained the ability to include > *.xconf files without needing to rewrite the main > xconf file. Actually this had been sitting on my hard drive for a long time (around six months ago I was trying to make Cocoon Blocks become plugins). At the time I did the work the include wasn't available. I spotted this when I started work on the portal plugin yesterday, silly really since it was me who brought the xconf include stuff into Forrest a while back. ANyway, long story short, I am half way through reimplementing this using the include stuff. I'm a bit busy for the next coupld of days, but should be complete very soon. Thanks for watching ;-) Ross