Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:58:54 +1000
From: David Crossley <crossley@apache.org>
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick glimpse at Forrest's build times
Message-ID: <20050818155854.GB19433@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
References: <1546568659.20050811162541@rblasch.org>
 <20050818145749.GA18938@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <4304AB4C.2050208@apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4304AB4C.2050208@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

Ross Gardler wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >Ron Blaschke wrote:
> >
> >>I did a quick comparison of Forrest revision 231407 (before Cocoon
> >>update) and revision 230867 (somewhere near HEAD).
> >
> >
> >Flip those revision numbers of course.
> >
> >Thanks a million for starting this Ron.
> >
> >Hopefully it will lead into techiques that we can
> >use to continually monitor and fine-tune our product.
> 
> Thought for the future when this is sorted out. Can we create a new test 
> target that will do this profiling for us?
> 
> That way, each time we upgrade a dependency we can see if it impacts 
> performance.

Yep i wondered that too. We can take it a step further
and have it running on our zone and save a set of daily
logfiles. Perhaps analyse them with Ron's script.

-David