forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicola...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Planning the move to XHTML2 (Re: (FOR-184) Switch to XHTML2))
Date Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:42:15 GMT
David Crossley wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
>>David Crossley wrote:
>>
>>>I revised the list, taking the replies into account
>>>and adding some new queries.
>>>
>>>>- agree the subset of XHTML2 to be used
>>>>and document that via example.
>>>
>>>See other thread.
>>>
>>>>- create DTD's
>>>
>>>Why do we need DTDs for use with internal structure?
>>
>>For using XHTML2 as an input format.
> 
> For that part i did understand the need. If the xml instances
> declare them, then the parser needs to resolve them locally.
> Same with any document type.
> 
> Of course there are no DTDs yet at Appendix F or G.
> 
> However, we are discussing internal processing,
> and i was wondering what is the need for DTDs there.
> Is there any need?

No.

> Or am i misunderstanding something about XHTML2 and DTDs?

Not AFAIU.

>>In fact it will be a modularization
>>of XHTML2 via RelaxNG validation.
              ^^^^^^^^^^^

>>>>- Decide how to make the pipeline process.
>>>>Now we have body-*.html and stuff, but a simpler process
>>>>should be devised.
...
> Do you mean keep the existing pipelines and
> starting this new one so that old and new can
> work side-by-side until the new stuff is ready.

Correct.

No need for a separate branch means easier involvment.

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message