forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <>
Subject Re: locationmap mounting behavior
Date Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:32:55 GMT
Tim Williams wrote:
> On 8/14/05, Ross Gardler <> wrote:
>>Tim Williams wrote:


>>There isn't an immediate need for the latter, but there is a need for
>>the former, so why the question? Do you have another solution for the
>>forrest locationmap in mind?
> nope, just wanted to know which nodes need to allow child "mount"
> nodes.  I just committed the first capability described above and if
> it turns out "match" nodes also can have child "mount"'s, then we can
> do that later.


> i guess now i can look into removing the interim sitemap-based 'exists
> selector' solution to locationmap mounting.


>  i'm going to have to
> think through the plugin mounting though, if it works the same as
> project-level mounting then it should work fine.

Lets not worry about the plugin mounting stuff for now. There is no use 
case yet, we'll worry about it when someone comes up with one.


View raw message