Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50318 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2005 08:04:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2005 08:04:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 53797 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2005 08:04:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 53729 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2005 08:04:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 53703 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2005 08:04:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:04:48 -0700 Received: (qmail 46461 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2005 07:57:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2005 07:57:54 -0000 Message-ID: <42B11FC4.7060605@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:44:20 +0200 From: Juan Jose Pablos User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r190796 - in /forrest/trunk: main/fresh-site/forrest.properties main/webapp/sitemap.xmap site-author/status.xml References: <20050615195340.95733.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <42B0B8C0.6030303@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <42B0B8C0.6030303@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: 127.0.0.1 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ross Gardler wrote: > cheche@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: cheche >> Date: Wed Jun 15 12:53:39 2005 >> New Revision: 190796 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190796&view=rev >> Log: >> Add a config selector so the i18n transformer only works whrn i18n is >> true >> > > We are in a code freeze. This looks like a non-essential commit to me. It looks like a bugfix to me. :-) > Should it be reverted? Unless you want to deploy broken funcionality, it should not been reverted.