Ross Gardler wrote: ... > I would like to suggest yet another alternative for 0.7 for the issue of > raw HTML. This would be one in the form of a FAQ, a link to the FAQ from > the upgrade doc and a demo in fresh-site - in other words there is no > complex implementation to hold 0.7 up further. > > The FAQ would give the following sitemap match which should be placed in > the project sitemap in order to duplicate the 0.6 behaviour. > > > > > > > > > ... > I'm going to implement this unless someone spots a fatal flaw in my plan > (lazy consensus is in operation) I know I have only let a day go by, but I am truly convinced this is the best solution for 0.7 so I've gone ahead an implemented it. If anyone does object or find a problem I will take the responsibility to revert the changes. In the meantime I would appreciate it if some could test I have correctly emulated the 0.6 behaviour and see if the docs in fresh-site are clear. I still have to do the FAQ and the update document. Ross