forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <>
Subject Re: [Proposal] remove views from forrest (Re: Views as a Domain Specific Language)
Date Sun, 29 May 2005 23:48:38 GMT
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 16:02 +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>>>On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:39 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>So in conclusion, I agree with Gregors concerns, but I also agree with 
>>>>the direction Thorsten is trying to go in.
>>>Actually that is the reason why I am proposing that forrest is *not*
>>>officially developing views anymore.
>>Please reconsider. You are getting unnecessarily carried away by your 
>>emotion. Don't mistakenly read mails as if they were personal complaints 
>>when they are not.
> Ok, I did not meant to do that but it seems I did. Sorry! 
> I was *not* *recommending* it but was *offering* to do so because I
> thought that is maybe the best for forrest.

Thank goodness it is "an offer", that implies we have a choice, my 
choice is to not accept your offer. We need views, but we (the other 
devs) need  to spend more time understanding it.

(as promised I will explain my original comments when I have a clearer 


View raw message