Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:38:12 +1000
From: David Crossley <crossley@apache.org>
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: Q: Site and unique element names
Message-ID: <20050422093812.GA1059@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
References: <376286093.20050420133852@soethe.net>
 <20050421075132.GA28118@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <42677A1A.8050007@apache.org>
 <20050421235823.GD28494@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
 <1696019449.20050422111117@soethe.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1696019449.20050422111117@soethe.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> 
> David Crossley wrote:
> 
> >> >>I know this has come up before, but I'm not sure which of the info in
> >> >>old threads is still relevant today so I'll ask again:
> >> >
> >> >If you remind us what came up before, then we might be able
> >> >to tell you if still relevant.
> 
> DC> Any answer to that bit?
> 
> Sorry, I was not referring to just one bit or one question that had
> come up before.
> 
> I'd tried to find information on site.xml and tabs.xml and read my way through some
> longer threads in the archives getting more confused all the time.
> 
> One example is quoted from "Selective PDF"

Where did this next bit of discussion come from?
I cannot find it in the past of this thread.
Is it related to your current question?

I don't know about any problem with "Raw files".

--David

> >> As for tabs.xml I think it should also be in site.xml
> >
> > I tend to agree; current placement is just legacy. (oh gosh, another
> > thread! ;-)
> >
> >> Bring site structure to one place, make it simple.
> >> 
> >> Obviate the need for a content space such as xdocs. Let files be anywhere. 
> >> Forrest should be like a vacuum cleaner with many suction points. Just let 
> >> Forrest know where files are and "slurp" it will bring them in.
> >> Content can therefor reside on any host, be accessed and integrated into the 
> >> site.
> >
> > This is already somewhat decided.
> > The problem are RAW files (@see the other thread).
> 
> This may be useful for sbdy to remember a discussion that happened
> before, but all I can see is (interesting) pieces of
> opinions.
> 
> So I figured asking for a current state might be more useful then
> quoting from the archives.
> 
> Sorry to not be so vague on this.
> 
> --
> Ferdinand Soethe