forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <cross...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Q: Site and unique element names
Date Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:38:12 GMT
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> 
> David Crossley wrote:
> 
> >> >>I know this has come up before, but I'm not sure which of the info in
> >> >>old threads is still relevant today so I'll ask again:
> >> >
> >> >If you remind us what came up before, then we might be able
> >> >to tell you if still relevant.
> 
> DC> Any answer to that bit?
> 
> Sorry, I was not referring to just one bit or one question that had
> come up before.
> 
> I'd tried to find information on site.xml and tabs.xml and read my way through some
> longer threads in the archives getting more confused all the time.
> 
> One example is quoted from "Selective PDF"

Where did this next bit of discussion come from?
I cannot find it in the past of this thread.
Is it related to your current question?

I don't know about any problem with "Raw files".

--David

> >> As for tabs.xml I think it should also be in site.xml
> >
> > I tend to agree; current placement is just legacy. (oh gosh, another
> > thread! ;-)
> >
> >> Bring site structure to one place, make it simple.
> >> 
> >> Obviate the need for a content space such as xdocs. Let files be anywhere. 
> >> Forrest should be like a vacuum cleaner with many suction points. Just let 
> >> Forrest know where files are and "slurp" it will bring them in.
> >> Content can therefor reside on any host, be accessed and integrated into the

> >> site.
> >
> > This is already somewhat decided.
> > The problem are RAW files (@see the other thread).
> 
> This may be useful for sbdy to remember a discussion that happened
> before, but all I can see is (interesting) pieces of
> opinions.
> 
> So I figured asking for a current state might be more useful then
> quoting from the archives.
> 
> Sorry to not be so vague on this.
> 
> --
> Ferdinand Soethe

Mime
View raw message