forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thorsten Scherler <thors...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Plugin naming conventions
Date Wed, 13 Apr 2005 06:17:30 GMT
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:54 +1000, David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> > As has been agreed all plugins are to be renamed so that they conform 
> > with our naming convention. However, is the naming convention right?
> > 
> > Currently we say:
> > 
> > org.apache.forrest.plugin.NAME-input
> > 
> > org.apache.forrest.plugin.NAME-output
> > 
> > org.apache.forrest.plugin.NAME-internal
> > 
> > 
> > Wouldn't it make more sense as:
> > 
> > 
> > org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.NAME
> > 
> > org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.NAME
> > 
> > org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.NAME
> 
> I agree. Actually, i had already wondered that when last
> we spoke about the naming convention, but i just assumed
> that there was a reason for the former.
> 
> --David


WHY do we want to include input/... in the naming? 

salu2
-- 
thorsten

"Together we stand, divided we fall!" 
Hey you (Pink Floyd)


Mime
View raw message