Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>> Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> All that being said, Forrest could be made to support both a separate
>>> file or embedded data (there are use cases where the simplistic
>>> solution is the best one). The problem with this is that we will have
>>> two locations for storing the same data - could be confusing for users.
>>
>>
>> IMHO the least we have to worry about is to confuse users. I have seen
>> that if there is a simple and a more complete way, users would not get
>> confused.
>>
>> The only confusion would come out of using both methods at the same
>> time, with clashing metadata values. Ouch!
>>
>> I'll browse the web for 'rdf in html', 'xhtml metadata' etc to see how
>> this is defined elsewhere. I want to try to reinvent the wheel the
>> least possible.
>
>
> And I did :-)
>
> From what I read it seems that making it possible to embed in xhtml
> *and* be able to king to a metadata file is the solution to pursue.
OK, I'm working on meta-data in an extension to Burrokeet soon (using
Dublin Core). I'll follow up on these links and create a separate RT
(after 0.7 release).
Ross
|