forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <rgard...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [plugin] Warning, Errors, Fatals and Libraries (again)
Date Mon, 03 Jan 2005 19:58:40 GMT
Ron Blaschke wrote:
> Monday, January 3, 2005, 4:32:55 PM, Ron Blaschke wrote:
> 
>>Sunday, January 2, 2005, 11:45:19 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>>Ron Blaschke wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>- forrest validate-xdocs
>>>
>>>Validation is done by Forrest itself, all source documents in the
>>>project are validated when the site is built using "forrest site". There
>>>is (should be?) no need for plugins to handle validation separately, or
>>>am I missing your point?
>>
>>completeness.  Another thought that just pops up: Should "raw content"
>>files (HTML, ZIP, PNG, ...) get validated?
> 
> 
> Now here's a thought (which may or may not be serious): Would it be
> worth to create another type of plugin, "validation" ?  Just thinking
> out loud here...

If there is a strong enough use case for such functionality I do not 
think it is the job of a seperate plugin, rather the job of the relevant 
input plugin that handles the relevant input format (or the core xmaps 
for raw resources).

Ross


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 03/01/2005


Mime
View raw message