forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <>
Subject Re: [plugin] Warning, Errors, Fatals and Libraries (again)
Date Mon, 03 Jan 2005 19:58:40 GMT
Ron Blaschke wrote:
> Monday, January 3, 2005, 4:32:55 PM, Ron Blaschke wrote:
>>Sunday, January 2, 2005, 11:45:19 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>Ron Blaschke wrote:
>>>>- forrest validate-xdocs
>>>Validation is done by Forrest itself, all source documents in the
>>>project are validated when the site is built using "forrest site". There
>>>is (should be?) no need for plugins to handle validation separately, or
>>>am I missing your point?
>>completeness.  Another thought that just pops up: Should "raw content"
>>files (HTML, ZIP, PNG, ...) get validated?
> Now here's a thought (which may or may not be serious): Would it be
> worth to create another type of plugin, "validation" ?  Just thinking
> out loud here...

If there is a strong enough use case for such functionality I do not 
think it is the job of a seperate plugin, rather the job of the relevant 
input plugin that handles the relevant input format (or the core xmaps 
for raw resources).


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 03/01/2005

View raw message