Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31139 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2004 18:50:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 2004 18:50:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 19564 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2004 18:50:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 19532 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2004 18:50:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 19518 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2004 18:50:32 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:50:28 -0800 Received: (qmail 31039 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2004 18:50:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 20 Dec 2004 18:50:26 -0000 Message-ID: <41C71EF0.2010106@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:50:24 +0100 From: Juan Jose Pablos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: Unit tests References: <20041220095326.99421.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <41C6A583.6090500@apache.org> <20041220104131.GA14880@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <41C6B689.2080603@apache.org> <1103553022.41c6e1fe3a575@secure.solidusdesign.com> <41C6E8CC.8020208@apache.org> <41C719FE.2060808@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <41C719FE.2060808@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: 127.0.0.1 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ross Gardler wrote: > Yes, we have had some good results from Canoo Webtest when testing > things like this. Th test target would need to start a server then run > a series of requests against a set of test inputs (see > http://webtest.canoo.com/webtest/manual/WebTestHome.html ) but that is only html stuff. I would like to get something that we can use to test xml (xdoc,oo,xhtml) output. Are they able to take

and

as same results? > > Right now all the plugins do when tested is they build the documentation. > I am looking right now on http://xsltunit.org/ , But I am not 100% sure that we can incorporate it on forrest. I know nothing about licenses..