Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39017 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2004 21:54:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2004 21:54:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 8359 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2004 21:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 8288 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2004 21:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 8240 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2004 21:54:27 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from indexgeo.net (HELO indexgeo.net) (65.77.211.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:54:25 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (static-109.227.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.227.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iB1LsLZx022293 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:54:23 -0600 Message-ID: <41AE3D8B.2030101@apache.org> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:54:19 +1100 From: David Crossley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Macintosh/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: Questions on upgrading cocoon used by Forrest References: <41ABC730.8080706@apache.org> <33465.10.0.0.5.1101777441.squirrel@www.agssa.net> <41ABCF1B.9080204@apache.org> <41AC21B0.7090904@apache.org> <41ACBA72.4020403@apache.org> <41AE0BA4.3060802@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <41AE0BA4.3060802@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rick Tessner wrote: > Rick Tessner wrote: >> >> In the changes for Cocoon 2.1.6, >> http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/changes.html , it does say that the >> @pass-through attribute has been implemented. >> >> I'll try Forrest with Cocoon 2.1.6 today and see how that goes. > > :( Doesn't look like the @pass-through attribute works in Cocoon 2.1.6 > which I guess answers the question about whether we use the Cocoon trunk > or not. Drat. Did you gain any clues about the problem? > So, the Cocoon trunk it is. Well, lets get an upgrade done quickly while it is still in a stable state. --David