Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90973 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2004 08:41:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2004 08:41:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 43398 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2004 08:41:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 43349 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2004 08:41:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 43335 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2004 08:41:08 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de (HELO natnoddy.rzone.de) (81.169.145.166) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:41:08 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.107] (223.red-213-227-54.user.auna.net [213.227.54.223]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB98f43n029071 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:41:04 +0100 (MET) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] - Switch to log4j as forrest log system From: Thorsten Scherler To: forrest dev In-Reply-To: References: <33765.10.0.0.5.1102559533.squirrel@www.agssa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1102581667.3809.5.camel@gci> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:41:07 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N El jue, 09-12-2004 a las 08:52, Nicola Ken Barozzi escribi�: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > > Hi: > > > > The proposal is to switch forrest to use log4j instead of LogKit (cocoon > > default). In cocoon 2.2 is not too dificult to make the switch. That will > > allow us to use chainsaw: > > > > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/chainsaw.html > > > > I wanted to make it a vote, but is better to discuss it before voting. > > Oops, I forgot one thing... > > I had made a custom Logger that logs to the project build dir or the > webapp log for the 'copyless' operation, and that has to be ported too. Other things we have to consider? Otherwise I am with Antonio because I am more familar with Log4j and really like it. +1 for going ahead and making a vote. -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)