The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Ross Gardler
Created: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 7:29 PM
Body:
If we add the content attribute then we should really add all attributes from the meta-data
attribute collection (see http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-metaAttributes.html#s_metaAttributesmodule)
The meta-data module is one scheduled to be included with the move to XHTML so I see no problem
with this attribute being added, but do we need it? According to the XHTML spec, if the content
attribute is missing from a meta element then the elemets contents are assumed to be its content
(see above linked page). That is how things are working at the moment.
So do we need this patch? I'd prefer to see all the attributes on the above page added, rather
than just some of them, but then if you have a strong use case I see no problem with it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-414?page=comments#action_11952
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-414
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: FOR-414
Summary: add @content to document document-v20.mod meta attribs
Type: Improvement
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Minor
Project: Forrest
Components:
Core operations
Versions:
HEAD
Assignee:
Reporter: Sean Wheller
Created: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:43 PM
Updated: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 7:29 PM
Description:
Add content attribute to meta element.
<meta name="description" content="Free Open Source GNU/Linux Training Materials"/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.cocoondev.org//secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|