Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53206 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2004 01:02:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2004 01:02:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 5579 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2004 01:02:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 5390 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2004 01:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 5379 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2004 01:01:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of cjxaf-forrest-dev-1@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:01:58 -0800 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CPsUF-0002KQ-00 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:01:55 +0100 Received: from 80-28-197-189.adsl.nuria.telefonica-data.net ([80.28.197.189]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:01:55 +0100 Received: from thorsten by 80-28-197-189.adsl.nuria.telefonica-data.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:01:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@forrest.apache.org From: Thorsten Scherler Subject: Re: [Skins] Leather-dev vs. scale-dev Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:01:59 +0100 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <000001c4c1df$056ca310$6400a8c0@computer> <1b0b455704110314335d49cccc@mail.gmail.com> <1099615870.22786.81267.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80-28-197-189.adsl.nuria.telefonica-data.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5 X-Accept-Language: en, de-de In-Reply-To: <1099615870.22786.81267.camel@ighp> Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Crossley escribi�: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > >>Diwaker Gupta escribi�: > > [snip] > >>>I agree with Shaun here. Even I had a go at placing the search box >>>"correctly" using just CSS, but it doesn't work. Sure its a challenge, >>>but CSS was really not meant so much for "positioning" as for generic >>>layouts. Absolute positioning sucks (and breaks with browsers, >>>resolution, changing window size and what not) so we don't want to go >>>that way. Relative positioning also floats things around beyond our >>>control. >> >>Ok, have a look at [1] >> >>I thought about that and agree to your arguments. > > > Language barrier alert: > Thorsten would mean "agree with" (i.e. the community way) > rather than "agree to" which sounds authoritarian. > Nobody is in control here. > Cheers, mate. ;-) Yes that is what I wanted to say. I am starting to forget my english. Sorry. -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall" Hey you (Pink Floyd)