Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79318 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2004 21:02:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2004 21:02:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 66514 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2004 21:02:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 66478 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2004 21:02:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 66467 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2004 21:02:23 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.23.3.141] (HELO heisenberg.zen.co.uk) (212.23.3.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:02:21 -0800 Received: from [82.69.78.226] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CTnzM-0005pE-SP for dev@forrest.apache.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:02:16 +0000 Message-ID: <41991957.4020005@apache.org> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:02:15 +0000 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: Duplicate code References: <4198ABE3.4060006@che-che.com> <4198B039.5050205@apache.org> <4198B5D1.3010407@che-che.com> <4198D14C.5050602@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.69.78.226] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Ross Gardler wrote: > >> > ... > >> I agree that updating the plugins should be a separate target, this is >> something on my mental todo, but I have not yet done it. > > > I disagree, users should not be forced to calla separate target just to > build a site. Hmmmm.. good point. The reason I thought it would be a good idea was that because it would skip a trip out to numersous distribution sites. However, given your comment it would be better to make it configurable in forrest.properties where the default is to check for updates. Ross