Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40316 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2004 22:42:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2004 22:42:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 3727 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2004 22:42:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 3683 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2004 22:42:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 3669 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2004 22:42:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.77.211.93] (HELO indexgeo.net) (65.77.211.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:42:16 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (static-109.227.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.227.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iA3MgCwX005245 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:42:13 -0600 Subject: Re: Online DTDs broken From: David Crossley To: dev@forrest.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: <26D1D407-2D2D-11D9-8B4D-00039385397E@medata.com> <1099443634.22786.72316.camel@ighp> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1099521681.22785.75939.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 04 Nov 2004 09:41:22 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Clay Leeds wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Clay Leeds wrote: > >> Dave Brondsema wrote: > >>> SVN restructuring has broken the rewriting we do to serve DTDs from > >>> subversion. E.g. http://forrest.apache.org/dtd/skinconfig-v06-3.dtd > >> > >> Is there some sort of workaround for this, so I can continue building > >> sites? > > > > I am going to adjust the .htaccess file now. > > Thanks! > > > However, this is ringing huge alarms bells for me. > > > > If your forrest is going to the network to > > get the DTDs, then the Catalog Entity Resolver > > is busted on your system. > > > > I recall discussing this with you before, > > but don't remember you answering. I will dig > > through the archives and try again. > > Yeah... I remember, but I don't recall where that is either. > > BTW, it could have to do with the PATCH I submitted in one of > yesterday's posts. No, it was ages ago. An issue with you not being able to resolve the local DTDs. > Under "General configuration notes" shouldn't this > section have $FORREST_HOME instead of $FORREST: > > $FORREST/src/core/context/resources/schema/catalog.xcat (for XML > Catalog) or $FORREST/src/core/context/resources/schema/catalog (for TR > 9401 Catalog). That was before the change to the location of FORREST_HOME. I have your patch marked as important, and will try today. > It may also have to do with setting the CatalogManager.properties > (which I mentioned in a previous msg I haven't been able to figure out > from the current docs). Hmmm, i searched my archives quickly but cannot find that. What was the subject line? > > However, i would like to know why you think > > your problems described below have anything > > to do with the Forrest website and the default DTDs. > > > >> ATM, every time I try to build using the 0.6 release, I get > >> errors complaining that link must be declared or that "p" must match > >> "(strong|em|code|sub|sup|br|img|icon|acronym|a)" and I notice that > >> "link" is conspicuously absent: > > > > Actually this sounds to me like you are mixing the > > document-v1* and document-v2* DTDs. If so, then this > > is just an xml validation error on your part. > > Yeah... it was a problem with changing to in > document-v2*. Thanks for the prompt in the right direction! I wonder > why I didn't have that problem before the Online DTDs broken post? Me too. However, you must have had the problem because is not in the 2.0 DTDs no matter where the DTD comes from. One way to be sure is to use ngrep.sf.net to watch for network traffic ('ngrep dtd') or pull the plug on your Internet connection. -- David Crossley