forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <>
Subject Re: [RT] RAW content
Date Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:40:10 GMT
Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>> IIRC RAW files were introduced for two reasons:
>>  1 - be able to reference a file without Forrest touching it
>>  2 - be able to reference a set of files without having them linked
>> For point one IMHO our best bet is to refer to them as file.source.html.
> If you want to import javadocs on forrest you will need to rename all 
> files and links  from *.html to *.source.html that is why I do not think 
> that was a good idea.

If the content developer identifies the directories/files that are RAW 
then Forrest can handle them differently (a RAW plugin).

The .source.html extension is only required if we need the source format 
of a none-raw file.


View raw message