Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>
>> IIRC RAW files were introduced for two reasons:
>>
>> 1 - be able to reference a file without Forrest touching it
>> 2 - be able to reference a set of files without having them linked
>>
>> For point one IMHO our best bet is to refer to them as file.source.html.
>>
>
> If you want to import javadocs on forrest you will need to rename all
> files and links from *.html to *.source.html that is why I do not think
> that was a good idea.
If the content developer identifies the directories/files that are RAW
then Forrest can handle them differently (a RAW plugin).
The .source.html extension is only required if we need the source format
of a none-raw file.
Ross
|