forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Juan Jose Pablos <che...@che-che.com>
Subject Re: [RT] Forrest processing pipeline
Date Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:27:27 GMT
Dave Brondsema wrote:
> 
> Emails allow a good discussion, whereas documents do not so much 
> (especially about comments regarding the doc's content).
> 
documents represent what we agree. Doing sections would allow to 
concentrate on specific issues

> If there's a consensus, we'll just add a new issue tracking entry with 
> nice summary and a link to the thread.
It can be done creating issues and linking. But with the above solution 
you create the documentation at the same time.

> 
>> So If you want I can put this on a xdoc on our site, and we modify 
>> parts until we reach a global consensus.
>>
> 
> if we take this approach, two suggestions:
> 
> a directory in site-author for developer ideas, or proposals would be good.
> 
> xdocs can take a while to write (unless you adept w/ a good XML editor), 
> i'd suggest a .jspwiki file

Fine, we need a wiki then. Welcome Spam.



Mime
View raw message