Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <416551AB.3080705@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:24:43 +0100
From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build issues when svn switch
References: <200410062217.21061.sean@inwords.co.za>
 <200410071148.02885.sean@inwords.co.za> <41653FA8.3090300@apache.org>
 <200410071545.43350.sean@inwords.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <200410071545.43350.sean@inwords.co.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sean Wheller wrote:
> On Thursday 07 October 2004 15:07, Ross Gardler wrote:
> 
>>Sean Wheller wrote:
>>
>>>This increases the likely hood that use of the standard svn switch dev
>>>method will not work.
>>
>>I have been watching the commits that have been made, and most of them
>>are skin or docs changes. There are none of any significance with regard
>>to the build in the list you copied in your mail.
> 
> 
> I don't think it is the build per se. Rather that there may be bits and pieces 
> in the update operation that cause a problem. I will try looking at it 
> closer, but don't have time to go over all the differences, so I will test it 
> once the branch and trunk have come closer together.

But surely if a straight checkout of the branch works for you then it 
can't be a problem with the code in the branch?

What do your logs say when you get the failure?

Ross