forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <>
Subject Re: [RT] How to move the skins into a plugin? Plans for leather-dev/corium
Date Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:35:49 GMT
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:


>> The idea is to move the skins into a plugin like the
>> plugin. BTW I reckon we have to capsulate the pdf into a plugin for its
>> own. IMO it should be not in the skin. IMO this part will need some
>> loving care in the future. ;-) I reckon we can call it fo-plugin.
>> The skin-plugin should be the main plugin for all skin related issues. 
>> It is what I would refer to as top level plugin that can host 
>> different sub-plugins. This way it should be possible to reuse our 
>> skin-functinality even better and more efficient.
> Wait a second, we already have this, but it's not called plugin.
> Every skin can make it's *own* fo (->PDF) output stylesheets, and is not 
> found it uses the common templates. How is this lacking now?

I think Thorsten is proposing that we should be able to replace the PDF 
portion of a skin without the need to copy over the XHTML portion 
(admittedly the XHTML portion would be a series of xsl:includes but it 
still requires work).

>> That leads me to generaly override certain parts of the skin. I would 
>> like to add an overriding mechanism like this
>> <extra-xhtml>
>> <!--e.g. some jscripts need to be in the head of the xhtml doc-->
>>  <xhead>
>>   <xscripts/>
>>   <extra-css>
>>    <css-override name="branding" src="scale.css">
>>   </extra-css>
>>  <xhead>
>> <!--e.g. some jscripts need to be in the body-->
>>  <xbody>
>>   <xscripts/>
>>  </xbody>
>> </extra-xhtml>
>> This could be used to parse extra parts into the skin in easy way. 
>> With that mechanism it will be as well possible to realize that 
>> certain parts of the site can be different form other. Trying to say 
>> it fuels the individuality of the skin without the need to write 
>> xslt-templates.
> Hmmm, recreating XSLT?

I read this differently, to me it says "enabling *users* to insert stuff 
into their generated pages without the need to edit XSLT". For example, 
WYSIWYG editing scripts could be inserted into the <xscripts> element. 
This is even more powerful if I can provide a regular expression stating 
which pages it should/should not be inserted into.

 From a non-dynamic perspective, how about inserting some meta tags that 
Forrest does not currently support.

>> That makes it easy to offer the personal skin *without* writing (copy 
>> n' paste) a new skin and change only some functions, css and skellton 
>> elements. Even better we can use the #forrest.skins.descriptors 
>> approch for that. :)
> Have you not tried the current system?

Yes, and I do not believe it is as flexible as Thorsten is proposing. 
Currently if I want to add a footer to my PDF files I have to copy a 
whole skin and edit the FO XSL's. With Thorstens proposal I would simply 
need to edit a FO skin-plugin and not touch the XHTML portion. From a 
users perspective I think this makes things much easier, from a dev 
perspective it means I don't have to keep my slightly modified skin in 
sync with the developments here in Forrest.


View raw message