forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <rgard...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [proposal] SVN restructure for subprojects
Date Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:16:08 GMT
Rick Tessner wrote:
> Dave Brondsema wrote:
> 
>> Any more thoughts on this?  We should put it to a vote soon, so we can 
>> get
>> the plugins in SVN.
> 
> 
>>> Quoting Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicolaken@apache.org>:
> 
> 
>>>> forrest/
>>>>   branches/**
>>>>   tags/**
>>>>   trunk/
>>>>     bin/
>>>>     site/
>>>>     dist/
>>>>     forrestcore/
>>>>     forrestbot/
>>>>     forrestbar/
>>>>     forresteclipse/
>>>>     forrestxxe/
>>>>     forrestplugins/
>>>>      OpenOffice.org/
>>>>      DocBook4.3/
>>>>
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I just have one little nit-pick on this and that would be the 
> "forresteclipse" and "forrestxxe".  I was thinking it be nice to keep 
> these under a separate directory such as "aids" or "tools" or 
> "contenttools", "contentaids", etc.
> 
> I just thought that there may be folk out there using XMLSpy or their 
> favorite content creation tool and may have tools bars, css, configs 
> that help with a given tool.
> 
> These things may well be plugins for their favorite tool, but they are 
> not forrest plugins.
> 
> It seems it could get cluttered on the "top-level" directory with things 
> like "forrestxmlspy", "forrestgnumeric" etc.
> 
> Thoughts?

We could place the editor extensions inside an "forresteditors" 
directory. This would have the effect of reducing clutter 
(forresteclipse and forrestxxe would fit in there to start with. It 
would also make it more obvious to the casual observer what these items are.

Ross

Mime
View raw message