Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16262 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 13:48:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2004 13:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 43863 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2004 13:47:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 43603 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2004 13:47:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 43388 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2004 13:47:26 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.23.3.141] (HELO heisenberg.zen.co.uk) (212.23.3.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 06:47:26 -0700 Received: from [82.69.78.226] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1C5PGk-0007NJ-P0 for dev@forrest.apache.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 13:47:22 +0000 Message-ID: <41405EE9.1060100@apache.org> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:47:21 +0100 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: Extending xmaps (was Re: project sitemap variables) References: <1094712161.1683.10.camel@ighp> <1094722232.1685.30.camel@ighp> <414032CB.8010104@apache.org> <414036A3.6030100@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.69.78.226] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Ross Gardler wrote: > ... > >> In the end I realised that since the local sitemap.xmap extension is >> processed before all other matchers I could just put everything in the >> project sitemap.xmap file. > > > Yup, this was my suggestion :-) > If you cannot do this for some reason, I'd prefer that we can see > together what makes the single user sitemap system not up to snuff for > your needs. Fair enough, I can't see any reason why it will not work, I'll try it now. Ross