Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18635 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 07:09:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2004 07:09:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 66944 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2004 07:09:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 66900 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2004 07:09:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 66889 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2004 07:09:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.77.211.93] (HELO indexgeo.net) (65.77.211.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 00:09:36 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (dsl-109.227.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.227.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8379NEv027928 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 02:09:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [RT] Forrest user impedence From: David Crossley To: dev@forrest.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1094195338.24415.15.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 03 Sep 2004 17:08:59 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > IMHO an ideal setting would not have the users generate the site. This > means having a live Cocoon webapp installed or having the ForrestBot > run. ... We are lots closer on that front. As we all know, there have been holdups due to many reasons. Recently we had an excellent discussion about this on infrastructure@a.o and even designed the workflow and everything. It seemed that all issues were resolved. Now we need the energy to put it into place. (Subject: forrestbot Date: 2004-07-30) One option was to wait for the new machines that are due soon. The other option was to approach the Apache Gump project to run it on their machine until the other ones are ready. We started on the latter and all is favourable. However i stopped because i reckon it is better to concentrate on our release. -- David Crossley