forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: [STATUS] Things remaining for 0.6
Date Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:08:04 GMT
Dave Brondsema wrote:
>>5 - I propose that we add two new matches:
>>     - *.html (that acts like *.ihtml, which itself will be deprecated)
>>              This will make it possible for Forrest to skin any site
>>              that does not have validation included, even if not made
>>              explicitly for Forrest
> Is this in line with our plan for xhtml2 and namespaces? 

It does not collide. The idea is to reserve *.xhtml for any proper 
xhtml, be it 1.1 or 2.

> I think using this extension in the 'xdocs' dir will confuse people.

Ok, but then we have lots of stuff there than are not x(ml)docs.

> Especially since
> the [i]html file has to be valid html (correct me if I'm wrong here) and
> lots of html in the world is invalid.

AFAIK ihtml can also be invalid, there is a tidy call before.

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

View raw message