Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 890 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 16:00:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 16:00:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 63870 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2004 16:00:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 63676 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2004 16:00:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 63665 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2004 16:00:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [65.42.175.122] (HELO ferrari.solidusdesign.com) (65.42.175.122) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:00:22 -0700 Received: (qmail 326 invoked by uid 2009); 27 Jul 2004 16:00:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 16:00:20 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:00:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Dave Brondsema X-X-Sender: user0009@ferrari To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: forrest subprojects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4105BA4F.8010108@brondsema.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Some (like forrestdoc) may become integrated as part of forrest and > > then should not be seperate. An important use-case I can think of right > > now is to be able to release new versions of a plugin/tool independent > > of forrest. > > Hmmm, so you mean we could do deparate releases of the tools that do not > strictly depend on the core? What about just tweaking the concept and > saying that the other projects can have extra indipendent releases? I > mean, with Forrest 0.6 we release all the other projects too, but then > till 0.7 the other project can do point releases indipendently? > That sounds good to me. -- Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net http://www.brondsema.net : personal http://www.splike.com : programming http://csx.calvin.edu : student org