Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55323 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2004 01:41:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2004 01:41:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 78447 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2004 01:41:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 78402 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2004 01:41:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 78391 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2004 01:41:27 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [217.199.181.91] (HELO wkwyw.ensim.dedicated-servers.co.uk) (217.199.181.91) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:41:26 -0700 X-ClientAddr: 82.69.78.226 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (82-69-78-226.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.78.226]) by wkwyw.ensim.dedicated-servers.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i711tOB31662 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 02:55:25 +0100 Message-ID: <410C49FF.5000105@apache.org> Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 02:40:15 +0100 From: Ross Gardler Organization: saafe.org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: docv12txt.xsl References: <40151D36.2020608@apache.org> <1091211540.3807.24.camel@onnadayr.ca> <410A94BA.9080800@apache.org> <410A9A3E.7030607@brondsema.net> <410C44D9.8020803@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <410C44D9.8020803@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ross Gardler wrote: >>> The problem is that it includes a small amount of code from another >>> source that does not publish its licensing terms. I have, via their > http://lists.fourthought.com/pipermail/exslt/2004-July/002096.html > So, currently the code is regarded as public domain. What does this mean > with regards to commiting it to Forrest? - one day I'll understand all > this legal stuff (yeah right!) A little more digging in their archives turned up the following mail, which was posted in June 2004, in response to my mail of January 2004. Anyway, I think it contains our answer: --- copied text from http://lists.fourthought.com/pipermail/exslt-manage/2004-June/001203.html --- You're free and clear to use the templates, but you should credit and link to exslt.org. As for copyright, there is no legal entity for EXSLT, but you can credit the original individual managers as follows: EXSLT templates are Copyright 2001-2004 Jeni Tennison, David Pawson, James Fuller and Uche Ogbuji There is no "license" as such, although I started discussion for choosing one (probably a creative commons license). You're not required to attribute or post notice, so you'd be fine within the Apache license, but I'd encourage you to pass on this attribution request, anyway. Thanks. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. --- end copied text ---- So does this mean we can simply put the relevant code into the XSL and place a comment to the effect "This template is Copyright...." in the code (as Uche says this is not required but it is good manners). Does the Apache side of things allow us to do this? Of course, it may be easier for someone with more XSLT skill than I to simply write an original version of the template (create a string of a given character that is length x). Ross