Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30226 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2004 04:06:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 04:06:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 24774 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2004 04:06:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 24737 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2004 04:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 24726 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2004 04:06:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [65.77.211.93] (HELO indexgeo.net) (65.77.211.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:06:26 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (dsl-109.227.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.227.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6S46M3I021753 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:06:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [Proposal] forrestbot at apache.org From: David Crossley To: dev@forrest.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: <1090851731.1667.72139.camel@ighp> <1090894820.1667.75814.camel@ighp> <4105C2B7.9070802@brondsema.net> <1090898208.1666.76042.camel@ighp> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1090987566.1667.79640.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 28 Jul 2004 14:06:11 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Dave Brondsema wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Dave Brondsema wrote: > > > Should we see what infrastructure thinks? I'm sure they'd have an > > > opinion about what'd work best. > > > > Yes, i think that we should see what infrastructure thinks > > before we go too far. > > Since I know forrestbot best, I'll propose it. Anybody else who is > interested, subscribe to the infrastructure@a.o list to join the > discussion. I'll post the results back to this list as appropriate. Good. > > > I'll work on a requirements list, we need that anyway. > > > > Great. > > It's done and forrestbot should put it on the website soon. > > > Would you guys like to see a demo of what the new webapp looks like? > > > > Are you saying that you have something public that we > > can look at? That might help when we try to explain it > > to the infrastructure@ list. > > http://brondsema.gotdns.com:8080/forrestbot-webapp > > The 'build' and 'deploy' commands aren't configured to work. login > forrest-dev/forrest-dev It may be better to change the text on that page to qualify the statement about deployment until the issues are sorted out with infrastructure. The last time that forrestbot was discussed, everyone went off on a tangent over that. -- David Crossley