From dev-return-11379-apmail-forrest-dev-archive=forrest.apache.org@forrest.apache.org Tue Jul 27 02:14:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86649 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 02:14:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 02:14:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 88990 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2004 02:13:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 88919 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2004 02:13:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 88851 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2004 02:13:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [65.42.175.122] (HELO ferrari.solidusdesign.com) (65.42.175.122) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:13:55 -0700 Received: (qmail 23764 invoked by uid 0); 27 Jul 2004 02:13:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.102?) (user0009@69.208.80.175) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 02:13:53 -0000 Message-ID: <4105BA4F.8010108@brondsema.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:13:35 -0400 From: Dave Brondsema User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Forrest Developers List Subject: forrest subprojects X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4605B4BE26D510EC67FF1435" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4605B4BE26D510EC67FF1435 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This email is sparked both by Ross's eclipse plugin and a small one which I might write to work with the IBM contribution [1] to the new eclipse webtools project [2]. (it looks really cool). That said, we have these plugins, forrestbar, forrestdoc, forrestlogos, even forrestbot (and its webapp), which are not directly dependent on forrest. I think it would be good to keep these completely seperate. They can have seperate releases and should be stored seperately in SVN. Some (like forrestdoc) may become integrated as part of forrest and then should not be seperate. An important use-case I can think of right now is to be able to release new versions of a plugin/tool independent of forrest. What do you all think? [1] http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/initial-contribution/ibm.zip [2] http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/index.html -- Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net http://www.splike.com : programming http://csx.calvin.edu : student org http://www.brondsema.net : personal --------------enig4605B4BE26D510EC67FF1435 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBBbpPVvBSb5uzznARAhK5AJkBw5w3TkuoEoejoUz61rz5FnlefACfaJRL duTthH/rjhFXsrmFtWOce5A= =f8yO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4605B4BE26D510EC67FF1435--