forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <>
Subject Re: [PMC] contribution procedure
Date Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:09:07 GMT
Scherler, Thorsten wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > This is not our way. It should be that stuff gets contributed,
> > we commit it, then we work on it, then we decide whether to
> > keep it, then we release it.
> > 
> > Sure, there are other situations where the committer will need
> > to judge whether the work is able to be committed at all, e.g.
> > perhaps legal issues, or maybe not appropriate to Forrest mission.
> > 
> > Your enthusiasm is definitely admired Thorsten, but we
> > need to follow the way that we know is a good procedure.
> Then write them down! I am too new to forrest to know all this rules 
> that exist but are not written down!

That is just the way that things are commonly done at all
Apache projects and really just taken for granted. So it
is not just Forrest in particular.

Yes it does need to be written down. We will use the words
from this discussion to add some documents somewhere.

David Crossley

View raw message