Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56210 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 06:39:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 06:39:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 74848 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2004 06:39:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 74608 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2004 06:39:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 74551 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2004 06:39:26 -0000 Received: from [80.91.224.249] (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 23:39:26 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYJD6-0004rC-00 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:38:48 +0200 Received: from host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it ([80.204.154.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:38:48 +0200 Received: from nicolaken by host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:38:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Subject: [RT] Open issues Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:38:22 +0200 Lines: 19 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Just a thought... what do others think about this? http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-issues.html It seems TM more a novelty than something useful, and it may confuse users since it duplicates JIRA information. Moreover, it's not regularly updated. Honestly, my first thought was to maybe remove it, but maybe it should somehow change to be more informative... with charts and stuff. Ideas? -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------