forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <cross...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DRAFT] Forrest Project Guidelines
Date Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:26:25 GMT
David Crossley wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > While I still stand by the basic role division, I think we have a minor 
> > problem.
> >  foundation/roles.html
> > Basically it defines a developer with commit access as "committer", and 
> > clearly says that they make day2day decisions of what changes to take. I 
> > don't take this "day2day" decisions as voting.
> > 
> > IMHO it becomes simple if we name "committer" the special developer and 
> > "pm-committer" a PMC committer.
> 
> I have tried to incorporate the discussion into the
> draft guidelines.xml ... would people please review.
> 
> Trying to see if we can do without making a distinction
> between developers who become committers, and developers that
> we might want to make committers to enable task-based access.
> 
> Do the current words facilitate that?

The document continues to evolve, please review.

-- 
David Crossley


Mime
View raw message