Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3527 invoked from network); 11 May 2004 22:48:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 11 May 2004 22:48:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 71933 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2004 22:48:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 71878 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2004 22:48:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 71845 invoked by uid 98); 11 May 2004 22:47:59 -0000 Received: from cjxaf-forrest-dev-1@m.gmane.org by hermes.apache.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamuko: 0.70. Clear:RC:0(80.91.224.249):. Processed in 0.242963 secs); 11 May 2004 22:47:59 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: cjxaf-forrest-dev-1@m.gmane.org via hermes.apache.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(80.91.224.249):. Processed in 0.242963 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by hermes.apache.org with SMTP; 11 May 2004 22:47:59 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BNg2Y-0004uG-00 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 00:47:58 +0200 Received: from ppp-82-84-148-69.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([82.84.148.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 00:47:58 +0200 Received: from nicolaken by ppp-82-84-148-69.cust-adsl.tiscali.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 00:47:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Subject: Re: Quarterly Report Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 00:47:53 +0200 Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <409DFEDE.4050005@wingsofhermes.org> <1084161077.2081.1617.camel@ighp> <409F0A58.6060406@brondsema.net> <409F6C18.6070403@brondsema.net> <409F8CA4.1010607@che-che.com> <1084229747.28156.1662.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-82-84-148-69.cust-adsl.tiscali.it User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Dave Brondsema wrote: ... > Thanks, that helped a lot. > > My biggest concern would be the direct responsibility for legal issues. > Obviously we know our code best so our own PMC would be well suited from > that perspective. But we're not lawyers. Even licensing questions can > get very confusing. So I don't know how qualified any of us would be to > be responsible from that perspective. We are responsible does not mean that we cannot ask for help to the licensing@apache.org list. What we have to ensure is that the Apache rules about licensing are always met, we don't have to invent new ones. > How does voting work? Currently (IIUC) only forrest committer's votes > count (non-committers are of course welcome and good to hear..) Does this > stay the same, or does only the PMC get to vote? The procedures are to be decided by the PMC, ie us. Since committers would become PMC members, and since only PMC members AFAIK (IANAL) can make actually binding votes for the project, the easiest thing to do is... to keep it like now, only changing "committer" to "PMC member". Having committers that are not PMC members would be a new thing to do, and we will have to discuss if/how to do it. In any case, I would like to remind you and all the others that there is no guarantee that the board will accept our request, although I personally remain confident. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------