Return-Path: 
 <forrest-dev-return-9956-apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91742 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 16:04:07 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2004 16:04:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 33228 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2004 16:03:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 33166 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2004 16:03:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:forrest-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32962 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 16:03:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.26)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2004 16:03:54 -0000
X-Sasl-enc: ctsxTBlQaF1kstQDb3Dhqg 1083600235
Received: from d206-116-255-7.bchsia.telus.net
 (d206-116-255-7.bchsia.telus.net [206.116.255.7])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE94AE70A7
	for <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>; Mon,  3 May 2004 12:03:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [copyless] Issues with //skinconf
From: Rick Tessner <rick@onnadayr.ca>
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <c74ppl$ob6$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <1083438624.3079.19.camel@onnadayr.ca>
	 <c74ppl$ob6$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1083600234.3617.22.camel@onnadayr.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Rubber Turnip www.usr-local-bin.org 
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 09:03:54 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 23:44, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Rick Tessner wrote:
> >      2. Move the skinning bits out of document2html and handle it all
> >         within the "skinit" resource.  This may require putting place
> >         holder tags in the html generated by document2html that "skinit"
> >         can then replace with proper skinconf values.  I like this
> >         option better than #1.
> 
> This is a good suggestion.

In the next couple of days, I'll try to put something together that uses
place holder tags in the document2html.xsl  (<div id="...."> tags would
seem to make the most sense at this point) and then have the "skinit"
resource handle the placeholder tags.

Thoughts? Concerns?

> We have sort-of seen how having different xsls for the page parts is 
> usually more an issue than a feature, so it may be that we will move to 
> a single xsl file, and keep the current decomposition using imports in 
> the xsls.

This seems to be a rather large change and not even sure I understand it
completely.  Are there previous discussions on this that someone could
point me to?

> This is the clearest and most detailed bug report I've seen in months :-)

Thanks! :)

-- 
Rick Tessner <rick@onnadayr.ca>