Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
From: "Brian S. Hayes" <brian.hayes2@comcast.net>
To: <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Forrest Signature in HTML source
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 20:07:46 -0700
Organization: Extended Thinking
Message-ID: <000a01c4452a$1f422cb0$6601a8c0@DIONYSUS>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <1085780162.23979.9.camel@ighp>
Importance: Normal

Okay.  I'm willing to take this on if that's okay. I'll research this a bit
and experiment around with my local Forrest instance to see what I can come
up with.  Naturally, I'll get a discussion going on the list.

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Crossley [mailto:crossley@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 2:36 PM
> To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Forrest Signature in HTML source
> 
> Brian S. Hayes wrote:
> > I apologize if this has been discussed before...
> 
> It has. We decided that it was a good idea.
> However no-one got around to implementing it.
> ... come on down!
> 
> There was various discussion on this topic and on
> the topic of META tags in general. Here is one thread:
> 
> [RT] - HTML META tag to indicate build by forrest.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106507937000004
> 
> The conclusions were that we should have some mechanism
> for adding various meta tags and specifically we should
> add a "generated by Forrest version ###".
> 
> > I'm sure follow-on discussion will determine exactly what is
> appropriate.
> > However, is the idea a good one?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> --David